User Tools

Site Tools


code:work:spectrum1151:spectrumtiming:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

code:work:spectrum1151:spectrumtiming:start [2016/04/28 22:06] – created davidcode:work:spectrum1151:spectrumtiming:start [2016/05/02 20:25] (current) david
Line 216: Line 216:
   * Check the trigger value, it looks OK, but the one above it did miss 3, wonder if the values are one behind?   * Check the trigger value, it looks OK, but the one above it did miss 3, wonder if the values are one behind?
     * This one shows 13223 and 13222 but the next shot above 13219     * This one shows 13223 and 13222 but the next shot above 13219
 +
 +
 +
 +=== Experimental Data ===
 +
 +== Lowered Data Depth Testing ==
 +
 +  * Acquire Time ?
 +
 +Testing 130k versus 64k, I am finding the start digi and end digi indeed take half as long.
 +
 +<code>
 +d=c130k.EVENTENDDIG - c130k.EVENTSTARTDIG
 +print,mean( c130k.EVENTENDDIG - c130k.EVENTSTARTDIG ) * t2s
 +6.5787344e-05
 +print,mean( c64k.EVENTENDDIG - c64k.EVENTSTARTDIG ) * t2s
 +3.3019777e-05
 +</code>
 +
 +  * **lvisF_64k.dat.meta.bin** average is 33 uSecs Acquire Time
 +  * **lvisF_130k.dat.meta.bin** average is 66 uSecs Acquire Time
 +
 +  * Transfer Time ?
 +
 +Looks to be that the event reset time is shifted by one sample.
 +
 +<code>
 +d = shift(c130k.EVENTDIGRESTART,-2)- c130k.EVENTENDDIG
 +print,mean(double(d(where(d LT 40000 AND d GT 1000))))  * t2s
 +   0.00010969424  ; 110 usecs
 +d = shift(c64k.EVENTDIGRESTART,-2)- c64k.EVENTENDDIG
 +print,mean(double(d(where(d LT 20000 AND d GT 5000))))  * t2s
 +4.9933655e-05 ; 50 usecs
 +</code>
 +
 +  * **lvisF_64k.dat.meta.bin** average is 50 uSecs DMA to PC Time
 +  * **lvisF_130k.dat.meta.bin** average is 110 uSecs DMA to PC Time
 +
 +
code/work/spectrum1151/spectrumtiming/start.1461881188.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/04/28 22:06 by david